Tuesday 3 March 2015

Acts of dumbness weaved into art of stupidity

30 Jun-The Ant Daliy
OPINION: Researchers and scientists are unable to provide rational reasons as to how we are able to tolerate and accept the consistent mind boggling stupidity we are subjected to.
The research community is actually considering extracting DNA from each Malaysian who is not affected by the stupidity syndrome to be used as a vaccine for lifetime against the ones who are carriers of stupidity genes. Consider the personal financial benefits.
The contribution of each and every ordinary Malaysian will be acknowledged through the ages. We in effect would have eradicated wars as the levels of stupidity would have been substantially reduced. Malaysians across the board must be nominated collectively for the Nobel peace prize. 
Even the so-called educated and titled among us are displaying an exceptional capacity to possess dumbness that equates with the famed limbo rock and often repeated adage “how low can you go?” The person with the fattest thoughts would grate and squirm to the sound of thunderous applause to slide past the lowest bar, and the bar may only be one millimetre off the ground.
If there was a special institution for this class of people, we have an excellent and colourful potpourri in the services of lecturers, teachers, film makers, headmasters, teachers, religious officials and bodies, NGOs, ex-judges, lawyers, politicians and the cream of leadership both past and present who could manage “The Dolts and Dimwits – Centre of Excellence” to be the most eminent in the world.
Who knows stupidity is the easiest qualification to attain a doctorate, research papers are not a requirement and plagiarism is a legal requirement. We must optimise the talent of persons who are infected with terminal stupidity and will just go on talking about racial and religious superiority when the whole world is striving to embrace each other with oneness? We have talented individuals who fit the bill to the boot.
These imbeciles are really making it so difficult for us ordinary folk, their gutter level behaviour and their positions make stupidity sound and look so complicated, intricate and out of our reach. The proliferation and pollution level of stupidity may actually increase to such a level that we may have others who may inadvertently be contaminated and infected. Psychoanalysts have already concluded that the malaise of stupidity is impenetrable and immeasurable as revealed by PET scans. Since it is irreversible, I beg the indulgence of each Malaysian to try your utmost to understand the affliction of stupidity that impacts our fellow countrymen.
There are some theories that have been expounded about the evolution of this plague. I register some of the thoughts that come about.
There must be some serious lack of emotional love or holding time. Sometimes a deprived and deranged individual may engage in the most hair-rising stunts, exhibitionism which displays an attention-grabbing cry for help. This may be one of those individuals who never received a lollipop or was disowned by a flea who just refused to give the bugger an itch in the strategic places.
Perhaps the bunch of individuals who act in a stupid manner may be opposition’s insidious weapon of mass destruction used to bring down the government of the day. Never discount this! It is a possibility.
We must ask why we are so competent and proud in running in the reverse direction to attain 196th place among the nations of the world when everyone else is trying to secure first place. We are literally begging to be first among the last and smartest among the dumbest. This deep profound philosophy is beyond the likes of Socrates, Plato and Aristotle, and I am most certainly missing something in my Freudian-induced mind. Ah my limitations – I will explain this another time in another age. 
One must not discount that our real comedians are not given enough airtime or just not up to the task, as such our only outlet and relief from the rigours of life are individuals and groups who actually froth and salivate on self-induced orgasm to give us spontaneous laughter. Oh no which do we cut, the brain or the organ for the orgasm if it is deemed against religious practices?
Yet again these may professionally be the smartest individuals disguised as stupid individuals to throw everybody off track while they employ this “get rich quick scam” and siphon the wealth of the country while yelling and promoting racial and religious epithets. It is common to see some politicians haranguing and cursing the West and everything about the morality of the whites and yet they use all products that are derived from the West. Once I had this pulsating coffee shop discussion as to why persons who come from Europe or America seem happy and content. And this is how it went as I summarise it.
  • They are happy as they have no morals; we are unhappy with all our morals.
  • They are happy because they have freedom; we are unhappy because they have freedom.
  • They are happy because they are Godless; we are unhappy as we are God filled.
  • They are stupid and yet happy; we are intelligent and yet unhappy.
  • They work less and produce more; we work longer and produce less.
  • They are happy they have peace, we are unhappy we have pieces from bombs.
The startling and unsurprising conclusion was that God is punishing these infidels! I expressed that if God is punishing the West, I am a sucker for this and absolutely love that kind of punishment which inflicts happiness.   
Looking at all comments, it appears as from groups who want hudud implemented, have read the Holy Book in the dark, or may have closed their eyes and read the Holy Book in dazzling light. This we categorise as natural stupidity. Desired stupidity is when you have so-called intellectuals of the highest order in our mobs that worship everything without understanding or opening the eye of the soul. With such individuals, discussion is plain suicide or futile.      
We have the dense monstrous pestilential maggots and venomous serpentine individuals who crawl out from the dung heap of self-inflated importance wreaking havoc. What emboldens the conduct of brazen stupidity and lends it a volatile nature is that we have authorities who have not charged them, neither for stupidity or sedition.
The prognosis is that vaccines don’t work on these individuals. Short of removing the brain, it is recommended that we employ the highest possible isolation technique. Here again we can apply for a patent as other countries have their own share of racial and religious bigots who are stupid, deranged, and demented. Unfortunately these countries have severe laws and jail people for such stupidity. We who profess compassion must place them all on one island together and on taxpayers’ funds (I am so sorry about this one). We ensure all the conveniences and luxuries of life are accorded. The only caveat is that if they label or categorise each other kafir or pendatang we have no option but to exercise or employ mercy killing, euthanasia or castration.
It would be virtually impossible to jail all pendatangs and a sizeable number of the ethnic diversities on account of rejecting stupidity and imbecilism and contributing to the rare sense to make this such a beautiful country.  Since we constitute a rational majority, we should just strip the stupid of their birth rights and citizenships on the premise of misrepresenting race, religion and country.      
- See more at: http://www.theantdaily.com/Main/Acts-of-dumbness-weaved-into-art-of-stupidity#sthash.Jzm6J8jV.dpuf

Broken songs MH370


Broken songs MH370

FMT LETTER: From Dr Dominic Damian, via e-mail
In the face of the most unrelenting and deepest tragedies our position must never be of condemnation or unrelenting attacks. No matter if it is incompetence or the lack of credibility or organisational structure.
When tragedy strikes like a thousand swords that painfully shear through one’s soul, we must employ humility, honour and reverence times of need across political affiliation and apply ourselves sensitively to healing the ones who are wounded, broken hearted or are in despair.
Our character as caring individuals and as a nation collectively will shine if we always remind ourselves that this could have happened to anyone. The Kajang by-election and all other political issues are suddenly not so important.
Cynicism and criticism in this tragedy will contaminate and spread negative thinking. By profession I am a music educator and record songs. I have placed and expressed my grief in song for the passengers, crew, family members, relatives and friends of all those impacted.
To hear the songs and view the lyrics, please click on the link: http://youtu.be/ng41Y7fq1CM

The dark clouds of May 13

April 29, 2014
FMT LETTER: From Dr Dominic Damian, via e-mail
With regard to May 13, if we Malaysians especially parties that hold stewardship of the country are unable to deal effectively on the platform of simple evident truths about what transpired, we will always be enmeshed in the quagmire and ghost of the past with never ending recriminations, accusations about who did what to who, why this or that happened without cementing and appropriation of responsibility to the parties, groups and individuals concerned.
We must be greater than the sum total of our mistakes by acknowledgment of all parties concerned. It is one of the many ways to move forward. Innocent persons whose lives were snuffed out in that tragedy and whose families were traumatised and destroyed should have the right to justice, closure, peace and the dignity of restitution from a fund undertaken by the government of the day in collaboration with other political parties who were involved in the incident.
The perpetrators who were influenced by the political leaders and those responsible for this day of infamy and shame must be accorded mercy to enable that the truth set’s us free. It is easy to claim innocence and moral high ground on account of defending one’s party or oneself. Before offering defence or excuses consider the following:
  • Quotes that were aggressive and proactive which would have created deep-seated animosity, anger and injury as follows are registered in documents during the various protests.
  • Malays, return to your villages, we are now in powerHey Sakai, you can return to the jungle
  • Death to the Malay aborigine – go back to the jungle
  • Death to the Malay
  • Blood debts will be repaid with blood
  • Obscenities and offensive gestures were directed at policemen
Both Chinese and Indian groups were intimidating and shouting insults at Malays in their vehicles near the roundabout leading to Maxwell school, while cars with Chinese and Indians were allowed to go through without harassment.
A poor and unfortunate Malay gentleman by the name of Kassim Omar was killed for no rhyme or reason on April 24, 1969 for no rhyme or reason in a degrading manner. His perpetrators were never brought to justice.
It is rather sad and ironic that the opposition and its supporters in victory never knew how to be magnanimous and gracious to the defeated who were fellow Malaysians. The effrontery, gloating, taunting, arrogance and insults were unacceptable despicable conducts that the opposition parties may have perpetrated and instigated by omission or commission. The frenzy, massacre and mayhem that followed should never be thought of or accepted as plot that was conceived, constructed and masterminded by cold, calculated scheming brutality.
Looking at all available facts it just seems like the build up of tension was the consequence of our politicians – nobody would have expected matters to get out of hand including our politicians, it was a naïve, terrible and grave miscalculation on their part.
The political responsibility of the leadership and discipline of its supporters was a serious infringement. Is Umno innocent and absolved in this matter? I believe they are just as complicit and must consider accepting the responsibility. Just view the matter objectively and ask oneself the following questions:
  • Why after 44-year we don’t have as many Malays in DAP or Gerakan? Despite the parties having essentially good political structures, and leaderships with open policies, they are unable to attract a groundswell of Malays or persons of other ethnicities?
  • The insecurity on the ground has ensured that the political ruling party goes into survival mode or the siege mentality syndrome. The following actions, though detrimental, were instituted over a period of time to ensure one ethnic group dominated:
- The civil service
- The police
- The army
- The judiciary
- Key government positions
- University intakes
- In education
Just about every segment was infiltrated in such a manner. I believe in taking such an extreme course of protective action, which though understandable, had direct consequences and implications on the loss of potential of the best human capital from across the ethnic groups. That fact that they could have potentially made us a world class nation par excellence was forsaken by motives that started off on a noble foundation but eventually was enmeshed by sinister, insidious and dubious thoughts at the best.
The policies of our ruling elite have systemically deprived, destroyed and depreciated the country. The lack of courage to show the world the best in Malaysia will be the defining legacy of the ruling party in years to come. We are teetering and languishing at the rungs just above the foothold of the countries deemed to be lowest.
I believe the future viability and credibility of political parties will be attained if they stand on a common principal, conceive the effort, commit their collective goodwill and throw their support behind a truth and reconciliation committee or commission on the tragedy of May 13. If one honours the simple commitment to truth, it honours those who died, honours those living among us who were traumatised by the incident, honours the survivors and the citizenry at large, they would exercise the conscience from the eye of the soul and record the truth. Anything less is a desolation of ideals, a desecration of hope, and an abandonment of the entrustment of each one’s votes.
Shame in anguish 
The first two leaders who followed Tunku were essentially good men who did their utmost to develop the nation. Each had his own style, there was nothing brilliant, exceptional or extraordinary about their capabilities. The face of corruption which manifested itself in the popular and powerful Selangor Mentri Besar Harun Idris was met with the resolve and constitution of steel by the PM of the day, Hussein Onn.
The moment he allowed for rule of law to be enforced within his own party the dice of destiny on the roulette wheels of politics would ensure that this principled man was doomed to leave the office of PM to a successor who though a successful PM in terms of structural development but a dwarf in terms of nation building, unity and bridging the soul of a nation. In this respect the Prime Ministers before the Doctor were persons who brought humanity to the citizens.
The Doctor brought about development and as such was awarded the title ‘Bapa Moden’. One would not find leaders of other nations having titles with the exception of the North Korean leadership. Such worship or adulation is contemptible as it deleterious in implying that Malaysia suffers from a deficit of intelligent citizens. Given the resources, any person with sufficient knowledge and will may have improved and advanced Malaysians in a far more progressive manner.
I contend that greatness is earned when you knit and sew the differences together by recognising the strengths of appreciable diversities we have in our midst. Greatness is earned when a real leader can extend protection and care to minorities. The measure of a leader’s strength is known when he can accord equality to all and sundry. The era from the 80s on was when the soul of the country was torn and ripped to shreds, it witnessed the decimation, degradation and sell out of traditional values.
The conceptualising backbone of the Doctor’s era is what I would call instant gratification of economic, social and deformed developementalism. Most Malaysians fell for this hook, line and sinker. The execution and deception were simple enough but the might of the state against the right of the citizens was disproportionate and disadvantageous to the citizen. In simple language, one can express them as follows:
  • A road was more important than a river.
  • Mountains and forests were sacrificed for buildings and development.
  • Grass gave way to pavements.
  • Fields and badminton courts were decimated for growth.
  • Shore lines and seas were barricaded for hotels and resorts.
  • Hazed grey skies overcame clear blue skies.
  • Freedom was enjoyed best behind bars.
  • Race and religion, pawns reduced to rhyme and riddle.
  • The simple traded for sophistication and sinful.
History must always seek to express the truth and wrestle with the positives and negatives of what transpired. With regard to development:
  • The NEP was designed with the best of intentions in the 60s to alleviate or eradicate poverty among the Malays. It enriched very few and left the masses still in poverty. Some of our poorest citizens are Malays. A moral policy of unconditional assistance would have united people but because of the insidious and cynical manner of implementation – disillusionment and division is what has been reaped. The giving was a chain to support to ruling party.
  • Placing the wealth in the hands of a few was a grievous error or an act of criminal negligence, I would choose the latter. A housewife, a fishmonger and a burger stall operator would know that they have to invest their monies in various securities to receive returns. The financial politics of developing people here is unsophisticated and unthinking and it actually borders despairingly on laziness. The structure was a blanket approach to just give contracts to one group or individual which is a serious infringement of basic governance. Any idiot with some level of education can do this, the specification is almost fail safe. The manipulation with the finance institutions and taxes was at an unprecedented level which continues unabated until this very day.
Trusting the wrong people was a colossal blunder with the exception of one legendary finance minister, all others were dismissal and had failed miserably.
I believe that this country was and is blessed with natural resources that even a mediocre or ordinary leader whose intellectual capacity is found wanting will not have a difficult task of governance. We have never needed a leader of exceptional brilliance to do the maths to make us a developed nation. We have also had resourceful and creative individuals and a hardworking population. This is precisely the reason I believe we must not fall over each other to worship or pay tribute to our leaders.
Each citizen’s hard earned money was used to support our leaders and we expect that they will serve the people well. This is akin to being employed and given command of a company and its operations, one is expected to fulfill the specification of the job according to the contract and leave when the contract is fulfilled. There is no hero-worshipping or according a person God-like status.
Have our leaders represented us well on the international stage? It is appalling, embarrassing and shameful that we have the leader of country expressing views that are caustic and so horrendous, not just once but consistently on many occasions. It is reprehensible to note that nothing could evoke sympathy for the innocents that have died. How can such a person be considered a statesman or a national leader?
It is very painful and shameful but we must acknowledge we had a leader who was and is a bona fide racist in equivalence to those who perpetrated the atrocities in the World War II and other times in History. I just wonder how many innocent lives were lost due to the hate-filled speeches which would have inspired some lunatic in some part of the world to kill another human being on views promoted by one of our ex-Prime Minister. Some of the views espoused were as follows:
  • The Jews for example are not merely hook-noosed, but understand money instinctively – 1970.
  • The Jew’s have always been a problem in European countries. They had to be confined in ghettos and periodically massacred. But they still remain, they thrived and held a whole government to ransom… Even after their massacre by the Nazis of Germany, (Jews) survived to continue to be a source of even greater problems for the world….The holocaust failed as a final solution.” – January, 2010.
This is one of the most reprehensible, vile, and uncouth expression from a statesman of so called international stature. The above kind of statements or expression in the world are virtually extinct, persons are castigated for such expressions. In our country we have been subject and exposed to some primitive fossilisation of thoughts and philosophies that are demented and vulgar against life. I cringe in embarrassment and deep shame when I think that Malaysia was represented on the world stage by such crass remarks.
It is abhorrent but we as members of the public were through a combination of propaganda, marketing, salesmanship, brinkmanship, media, want of security, education and legal intimidation through every available apparatus were intimidated and awed in a comprehensive manner. A small and conscientious vocal minority were effectively shackled and repressed by various means and methods.
In a most systemic manner the safeguards were dismantled and decimated to suit the needs of the politics of the day. The constitution which is deemed the vehicle of ownership of each community’s legal, political and social aspirations was torn asunder. That which protects and accords each person the inalienable right to citizenship and the security which accompanies it have in the face of multiple vulnerabilities, have had their confidence, shaken, devalued and destroyed to such an extent that we experienced migrations.
We do not need to hire million-dollar consultants to tell us what is wrong, just send out a brief two-page letter list of questions asking people the top five reasons for leaving the country. The top three answers though anyone’s guess would cement what people require. It is very painful but I have heard so many parents tell their children, “stay where you go, don’t come back, there is no future here, given the circumstances”. Now these are parent’s who know that such decisions would eventually consign them to face the twilight years of life alone with the accompanying inconveniences and deepest personal tragedies. Only people with no choice would drink the cup filled with the concocted potions of bitter choices. Is this not a sad reality?
Another jolt of reality was the death of our beloved gregarious, noble and simple Tunku Abdul Rahman who passed away in December 1990. He suffered when he chose to oppose the government of the day. The man who had understood and stood for a real substantive democracy and forged unity among races and promoted strong institutions in Malaysia was treated in a shabby manner. To this day, we do not have a day in our Malaysian Calendar assigned either to honour his birth or death.
From various sources it is made known that he died virtually penniless and this is the sword that really cut deep among us common folk. It is simply heartbreaking that our avuncular Bapa Kemerdekaan was not accorded greater dignity or respect. If a founding father can be treated in such a contemptible manner, what hope is there for ordinary Malaysians? Do we have anyone with his vision and calibre to resuscitate and calibrate the beautiful dream that we call Malaysia with aspirations of the people?

OF BETRAYALS AND TREASONOUS CONDUCT

Febuary 3 2014

FMT LETTER: From Dominic Damian, via e-mai
We are mired in discussions, opinions and accusations with regard to the Kajang episode and  the cream of the political intelligence, NGOs, lawyers, judges, analyst, bloggers and the ordinary citizen have expressed their views about this matter.
In my humble opinion the voice of reason, justice and morality have been compromised by so many parties that one expressing what may be the simple truth is viewed as exceptional and extraordinary. Opinions that emanates from a cross section has been varied and legitimate, perhaps it is time to hear what a simple citizen has to offer.
The cream of the political strategist and intelligence from both opposition and government of the day  have shown themselves to be devoid of either of the substances or foundation which allows for greatness to take root in our quest for nationhood. We have persons from the main opposition party who are the calibre, yardstick and measurement of no less than Rafizi Ramili, N Surendran, and Selena Tay coming up with what they deem as conceivable and acceptable excuses as reasons for a by-election is a stated requirement to save a state.
The Pakatan coalition already enjoys an overwhelming majority in Selangor and we are being spoonfed with the infant formula of rational that Pakatan have reasons in excess of the citizen’s intelligence to force the Kajang by-election. The maturity of any party resides on a platform of equality granted for all. Here we see a leader of the coalition elevated to God like status of worship.
The only person who can save the country so it seems is Anwar Ibrahim. This is not arrogance that belongs to Anwar but to his supporters who have lost all semblance or reality on the ground. We have 29 million people and it’s an insult to each person’s vote and intelligence that we only have one person from such a wide pool of people who can manage the country? What sort of nonsense are we espousing and advocating.
I have and will always have a soft spot for Anwar Ibrahim on account of the trauma inflicted upon him and his family by the unjust and merciless incarceration that he had suffered under the Government of the day. This is empathy is not just for Anwar Ibrahim but for all who are or who have been detained under dubious circumstances. I am of the opinion that Anwar and his family still suffer various forms of injustice. The opposition personalities also have my empathy due to the difficulties that we have in the system but this should never be used as a passport or licence to do as one pleases.
Our opposition party is showing a lack of maturity and is in grave danger of being a mirror image of the party/s they are trying to replace.
  • If one were to elevate a person to God-like, hero worship and cult like status  and project the person as the only one who can save a country it is unfortunately detrimental as it means that the partners and stake holders in the country – the ‘you’ and ‘I’s’ are persons who are expandable and lack the intelligence to understand the goings on. We must realise that the cult like worship status of a certain Doctor has placed us in this detrimental and unenviable position
  • It is a recognised, understood and accepted fact that there are existing laws and provisions in the law that allow for by-elections. Though one may have legitimate excuses which are supported by law it does not mean that we become squalid and spineless individuals who will use the analogical  excuses of strategy, advantage, and the so called big picture to have a by-election. Again the credibility and respect of politicians towards the citizens  is found wanting, our taxes can be squandered and dispensed in any manner deemed fit by either opposition or Government. If one were to quantify and qualify the amounts spent either on party or state and federal bi-elections, one should not be surprised that stupendous amounts that could have been used would have been expanded. I am not a financial analyst but I am sure that we would by now have enough money to dignify the lives of persons at large if we did not engage in
  • Clean elections and cheap democracy is what Surendran expresses, How good is your democracy when the actions taken seem to defy the simplest logic? Or another statement by Rafizi expresses that Khalid Ibrahim is good statesman but a lousy politician. If this is strategy that is of such security in its brilliance and bold  in excess by its content and execution,  or is this a strategy of the highest intellectual order? If it is then we can safely assume that Malaysia is a lost cause. On the presumption we the citizens are dimwits can we assume we the dimwits are allowing ourselves to be led by the smartest of dimwits. The imbecileian nature of our politics leaves me hanging my head in despair.
  • We also have the question of personal moral values. It is pathetic and unacceptable when we allow varied forms of intellectual justification to express the need of a bi-election. What is the preeminent rational which motivates and gives precedence to politics over the honour that we ought to have for each person’s  life and that persons dignity? Laws or personal morality? Can the morality of our daily life speak to the internal compass of conscience in our souls and  affirm that our constructive actions  secure
-  Equality for all.
-  Justice and mercy
-  Eradication of  hunger and poverty.
-  Care for the varied marginalised in our midst
-  Quality of healthcare
-  Life term education
-  Security
If our opposition is of a calibre or quality they will not just write some fancy documented manifestos but apply a practical living manifesto in the way they conduct themselves with respect for their own is a real insight. This forced, targeted or strategic Kajang bi-election reveals glaring inadequacies.
If the opposition is uncertain and uncomfortable with the overwhelming majority they enjoy, it means that they are simply incompetent and insecure about how to manage a state. How are we to trust the opposition to manage a country when fear is prevalent in their governance?
Nobility and dignity ought to be the common shared thread that epitomises our character. No matter how different or opposite our views we are entrusted to guard and protect the individual dignity of each and every person- friend and foe alike. This  is and must  be a requirement for a politician who in effect is supposed to be a statesman par excellence. Here we have persons from the same political party who are supposed to be allies expressing negative, malignant and depreciative comments about the Selangor Mentri Besar. Though I feel and agree that the Mentri Besar may have his flaws and faults, or may not be politically savvy, is this just cause and justification for this type of degrading vilification?
What does this say about our future leaders? What chance does the ordinary citizen have when the future guardians cannot extend simple protection of dignity to their own? Could this not have been handled in a discreet manner. I would like to ask the young ‘Yang Berhomats’ , would you conceive something like this against your Father or grandfather? If you would not then please show Kahlid Ibrahim the respect that is due, he is of an age to be your father. Please do not come with that tried and tested adage that states ‘I love Ceaser, but I love Rome even more’. Betrayal and treasonous conduct will find all kinds of flippant and flimsy reasons with concoctions and palatable examples cited of it being acceptable reasons.
It is always good to have various parties rather than two main parties, it seems in Malaysia a strong government is a dictatorship with rights totally compromised and a weak government is one that is totally chaotic, paralysed and ineffective that they are unable to control the small elements that are totally amok in our country.  A strong opposition seems like a mirror image of the existing Government; with a small difference – when they are small they work with the common citizen. It is better to have a few small parties and individuals – with common sense and integrity than to have a strong government or opposition – the citizens, the common person on the street is the impacted by strength in a negative manner.
I am also expressing some points that I feel about our bloggers who by far and large have been far more constructive than the political elite in awakening the conscience of the citizen must emphasise their concerns and points with a greater eloquence. It is distasteful when one finds a generous spread four letter words. Now with regard to language I have challenged persons in this manner if one feels that if the language  one uses in print  or verbal dialogues is of an acceptable standard. Then one should have the sterling courage without the fear reprisals in using such language in the presence of one’s respective place of worship, a Monarch, a Judge, a Court, on TV interviews, in the presence of one’s family, elders and little children. If one will not use it in any of the stated environments mentioned, one should not use it.
Though I disagree with RPK on his language and his comments on Malays, Muslims  and other ethnic or religious groups. I have respect and esteem for his views and cringe at the language or the brutality of the response, though a bit crass they are unpretentious and filled with integrity. It is RPK’s articles mainly that enable me state opinions about bloggers. In some ways I do feel like a rotten heel writing in relation to him, as he is one of those rare individuals who with his family has suffered for a cause in excess of his life and is deprived of his homeland as a consequence.
Nevertheless  I feel that we should always find a better or a kinder way to articulate our views without placing offense on the party that is challenging us. One should never attach a race or religion just because of some dysfunctional government policies. There will always be the individuals who chose to be antagonistic provocateurs when they place  comments that demean simple intelligence on a blog site – I sincerely appeal and hope that bloggers would never use the power of their well honed skills in language, writing and knowledge to embarrass or insult the persons who disagree with their writings.

Mask of evil

Evil appears as an unfathomable or simplistic agenda in our lives. We can refer to it as a deep impenetrable darkness that resists all attempts at rational and reason.
We always think or feel that evil is ambiguous as how it is seen and has no motivation. I am of the firm opinion that unthinkable or unspeakable evil has a premeditated cold and calculated motive.
One must accept the fact that evil or negative forces are a part of human life to varying degrees. Given the events in our country and the world, I had concluded sometimes that God must be malevolent to allow evil to exist and impotent to prevent acts of evil.The violation among human being especially on the platform of religion, breaching the lowest standards of goodness, justice and decency. There are many whose lives are lost just on the basic perimeters of paper thin marginal differences
For one to recognise evil, one must feel the reality of pain, suffering, deprivation as acts of abomination and unnatural cruelty that are perpetrated on the victims.
In this day and age of supposed advancement, we are armed with the powerful tools of knowledge and discussion as such ignorance is a very poor excuse against brutality.
We must acknowledge that all forms of atrocities have the benefit and professional advantage of clarity of intention, meticulous planning, technical innovation and a process of laws, justification either through a religious, racial or any other convenient agenda.
The root of evil can be chiselled out from the rock of religious terrorism and be exterminated in totality if one displays iron will.
If we aren’t moved and driven to our knees by the slaughter in Peshawar of the innocent and condemn it univocally our faith is emasculated. The expression that this is a senseless killing is very far removed from the truth. The children and attackers shared the same faith. This did not prevent these brutish murderers from the cold premeditated planning and executing their mission in a remorseless manner.
The tourniquet words of comfort offer no consolation to families and friends of the victims. The most eloquent condemnation to honour lives lost needlessly is that one should condemn any faith, religion or ideology that dictates:
  • Differences as reason to kill
  • Supreme ideology that breaches the equality of race and gender.
  • Justifies the tenants of the faith to kill another
We should just not have any of this. If our leaders or persons in governance are protecting extremist groups or are impotent, we have no recourse but to treat them as extremist and pariahs at the best.
The Pakistani government record has been dismissal and the blood of the lamb spilled in Peshawar has much to do with their policies for so many years. The political thought that one can control an evil beast and use it to one’s advantage has been a fallacious and the carnage that has been reaped on what was sown.
The direct consequence is unbearable grief and tremendous sorrow where retribution against the Taliban will not bring these lives back . In this day and age where knowledge is available at the click of a mouse/button no individual or group can act with impunity and claim immunity for their actions based on ignorance of religion – Evil in any form must be castigated and castrated.
We can either blame God for this misfortune of evil or we can accept collective responsibility.
In this day and age if we apply ourselves with conscience we can be a force for change and a direction that is non offensive. Freedom of will provides us the possibility to choose to be inherently good or to choose a path in defiance of good. This defiance of good is essentially the consequence of freedom which despite the negative connotations is a right that must be accorded to any individual and protected- but at what cost?
I think that evil constitutes a minority but appear like a majority as there is a silent majority of good people who by virtue of their silence accord evil a might and right that could easily be whipped into submission if we use our collective voice and will.
Many persons of various faiths extol and express various pronouncements in resignation that suffering and death is the will of God.
I always ask, does suffering need a God to lend it meaning? Will we attribute to God acts of suffering even if it is designed by perpetrators among us?
The question related to evil is a formidable intellectual challenge but it is certainly not insurmountable. Human history is filled with pages of compelling lessons on how religion, racist supremacist, entitlements or philosophies were used by the most intelligent and educated of individuals to advance a cause that has showcased some of the most horrible, demented, spine tingling catalogues of mass extermination and slaughter.
The mask of evil is not just in religion but it has shown itself in divisive racial agendas and also the philosophies of generations. The best of ideals advocated in the catchphrase of Liberty, fraternity and equality were coined by proponents of the French revolution.
Exacerbated by the fervour of this cause, the scale of pillage, plunder, destruction, and killing on an ideal was and remains an effrontery against the basic convention that life is a basic, sacred, and inalienable right in any society.
It is a shame that those with a majority of shared ethnicity, culture and language deem it fit to abrogate and grade the rights of other communities, reduce them to servitude or manoeuvre them into a condition of dependence and in very extreme cases it leads to extermination and genocide.
Looking at the current flow of events in Malaysia; are we being lead along such a path. In being pragmatic we must never discount the possibility that we may fall prey, we must never think for a moment that it can never happen to us!
I propose that religion, politics, ideals or philosophies camouflaged or coated with scriptural references of justification that threatens to breach the sacred repository of trust in life and the associated freedoms should be challenged and dismantled.
Any threat of such nature should receive the unequivocal support, condemnation and opposition from every segment of society no matter what our political affiliations or beliefs. A strong faith or a God who is divine does not need our defence, if any faith or individual claims to act on behalf of God and suppress or kill the very being that God is deemed to have created – it goes against the very basic principal concept and nature of how God is supposed to be conceived.
The incriminating question are we strong and courageous enough able to be able to prevent the growing presence of evil despite our ethnic, political, religious and social differences?
Trajectory of evil
We must not fall into a delusional trap, when we express that only governments that are religious appear to go down a dark road. A balanced objective view requires that one examines the secular Governments or individuals who lead them.
Mustapha Kemal Ataturk systematically deported Armenian and Greek-speaking Christians. During the First World War, a conservative estimate of approximately one million Armenians were massacred in the first genocide of the 20th century.
These men, women, youth, children and elderly were killed, raped, shot, starved, poisoned, suffocated and burnt to death, as they were regarded as dangerous microbes according to one top Turkish politician.
One need not look far for lessons further or nearer to our time: Nazi Germany and wartime Japan are evident examples.
The top leadership of both countries had some brilliant master politicians, thinkers and tacticians who were caring husbands, fathers, brothers, sons and friends and seemed ordinary enough. Consider that with deep reflection without a shred of remorse they carefully in a premeditated manner: relentless slaughtered and exterminated persons using all sorts of conceivable, creative and justifiable reason.
It was documented that in a single day one can expect a sentence to be dispensed for thousands of unfortunate individuals to be judged and slaughtered in a methodical and metronomic manner with cold precision and efficiency.
Individual evil can be contained and quite easily be snuffed out, but political evil is insidious when a party or a group of person’s impact and influence people to follow an agenda that benefits a specific group to the detriment of others.
One must never forget large segments of the German population supported the Nazi policies of racial persecution and genocide. It is shocking and revolting that people with a tradition of splendid culture, finesse, discipline and regimentation chose the evil of tyranny and barbarism over decency on the account of convenience and comfort.
The number of rank and file professionals who opposed such evil was rather small. Albert Einstein was one of those minorities who opposed the Nazis. Only when it was clear that the war would be lost was the erosion of support evident.
The permutations of the darkness and negativity begets the question is there hope against the vicious cycle of evil that manifest itself in what seems like an endless occurrence of conflicts.
I was once asked this perplexing question if light is possible in the deepest darkness where death is a certainty? I draw inspiration from a book titled "Landscapes of Metropolis Death". A child harmonica player in Auschwitz is playing "Ode to Joy" from Beethoven’s ninth symphony opposite the crematoriums of Auschwitz, and a few hundred metres from the place of execution. The most callous and degrading action were the norm and expectation. Without a given doubt, death here was an absolute certainty.
Imre the conductor of the children’s choir in the family camp taught doomed children and whoever else "Ode to Joy" in this barren inescapable prison.
Given the circumstances, this seemed like the most senseless and insensitive act. This song in a captivating manner sings of human dignity, humanistic values and faith in the future, in the camp there is nothingness. The simple desperate fact is that in this camp there only existed destruction and desolation. Each one was resigned so it seems to take this one song to their deaths.
Tragically Imre the conductor was gassed sometime in March 1944. It is generally thought that in the midst of such degradation and deprivation; Imre hoped that some children may survive the carnage.
To impart, implant and tender the gift of a song was done in the hope to prepare potential survivors the opportunity to acquire the finest and noblest in culture to rebuild civilization from the ashes of hopelessness. So I would take a leaf out of Imre exceptional courage and foresight and use it as a message of hope. Surrendering to evil or living in despair is not an option, we may feel and live on the knife edge of prosecution and persecution, even if we are consigned to being unknown, or ending our lives in apparent nothingness without the privilege of witnessing a sun kissed day or a night glittering with a million stars - we must resolve to be the sacrifice for that which is decent in humanity and call ourselves Malaysians.
We ought to do some soul searching and ask, can the evil of the past invade and overcome Malaysia? Going by what is happening in our country, are we on the trajectory of reaping unimaginable and unspeakable evil when we plough and sow with racial inequality and religious supremacy?
Insanity of evil
A few weeks ago, a social activist by the name of Rebecca Jane Thomas who is very pro-active with disadvantaged children and takes care of people was subject to verbal bashing and physical abuse from an individual who was operating an illegal goreng pisang stall within an enclosed low cost housing area of flats.
When she expressed her concerns to the offender that the stall with cooking oil and fire could be a potential danger to children who run through the area, she was immediately abused and told that she had no right to speak as she was a pendatang and she could go back to where she came from.
There were frothing expletives that were also hurled at Rebecca. This imbecile had the audacity to spit at her and threaten her physically. A police report that she lodged evoked no response. This may seem like a small act but it was one of those that eventually emboldens even a small time goreng pisang seller to behave in a thuggish manner.
The shameful legitimisation of violence and intimidation by a thuggish mob in Penang at the Speakers Corner against another group and their coarsening brutality and sickening vulgarity particularly against women was an indictment of the implicit nature and tacit or subtle support for such gangs from all stratas of governance.
This is not faceless evil and it can and should be stopped. If our lawmakers, or law enforcers can do nothing, we must change them or protest in volume as a group to awaken the powers to be that we hold them accountable.
Religion is as good as it is, and has proponents who have hijacked and used it as a tool of submission in the most negative of ways. We are witnessing the monstrosity of Isis rampaging and tearing apart villages, towns and cities in the Middle East. The indiscriminate and barbaric violence where innocent inhabitants are decimated and massacred is repeated with ferocious and chilling cruelty. We are experiencing a group that is behaving in a deranged and rabid manner where the perversity of behaviour seems to emit from religious faith.
If the claim to being a Muslim by Isis and like minded individuals and groups in Malaysia accord them the legitimacy and respect to perpetrate all manner of cruelty on people on the account of differences, we should just stop calling them Muslims and just term them as pariahs.
On the field of battle, there are Kurdish women who were begging to be killed after being raped countless times by the so-called holy jihadists. This act alone is a blatant defamation of the nobility, civility, compassion and honour of the Islamic faith.
If one interprets and represents religion like a savage rabid wild beast and kills or suppresses another, we must just use the heaviest chains and ropes of justice to cage the beast which uses the religious agenda to commit such unforgivable atrocities.
The deteriorating political, religious, racial relationship, social and economical inequalities in Malaysia is indeed a cause for grave concern. Does it not look and feel that groups like Isma, Perkasa, and individuals within the federal or state governments are in an infantile evolutionary stage that is displaying the capacity and backbone to transform into a local Isis or Nazi party. There seems to be a systemic implementation and deliberate attempt to undermine persons of other faiths inclusive of many good persons of the Muslim faith.
It is not surprising that we are experiencing and witnessing gradual disillusionment where individuals are viewing religion as belligerent, intolerant, irrational, dark and violent.
While it is true that we cannot fight every battle, champion every cause or feel the pain of humanity we are placed here for a reason and should not feel frustrated or powerless.
We must recognise that from the structures of Divine law there can be emissions of abuse and misrepresentation and this should receive conscientious and qualified objection without fear.
Exasperation on evolution of evil
A counterproductive understanding of religion seems to produce and attract individuals to come together as a cohesive group to act with extreme violence and cruelty.
The premise for this is they are utterly convinced that God is on their side. This is when mutual respect, acceptance and compromise become virtually impossible.
When it is thought, felt and accepted that God dictates and supports a group it seems justifiable that all manner of cruelty and barbarism is employed and used against children from eight months to the old and infirm of eight years of age and above, with no conscience or remorse.
This seems to be the road that the Ridhuan Tee’s, Ibrahim Ali's, Zulkifli Noordins and other like minded individuals and groups are embracing. Rational, moral or intellectual communication with such obstinate, contemptuous groups or individuals with primitive ideologies are the road to exasperation where we place ourselves at the grave risk of an infection of untreatable madness.
Malaysia is gradually spiralling on a self destructive mode, becoming polarised, contaminated and infected by the virulent nature of evil which is showing itself in insatiable greed, avarice, and corruption. Ethnicity and religion are the convenient chameleons that hide the real motives.
The politics of frothing hate and divisiveness in our country are intentional concoctions of venomous poison brewed in the toxic fires of racial and religious divide.
Like a double-edged sword, it may consume everyone without distinguishing evil and good.
In an incisive manner we must ask ourselves are we immune to such evil.
I do not think so. There are deliberate attempts and excuses to defend indefensible actions and some of it seem to garner support from apparently the most qualified and educated among us.
A former prime minister, ex-judges, academicians, professors, lawyers, doctors, musicians, artist, law makers, law givers, law enforcer holy men and women of God and anybody who requires his/her place in the limelight of notoriety.
They have all been part of the shameful regression of goodwill, repression of rights, revulsion against race, repugnance towards religion, retardation of politics, repulsion of decency, common sense and destruction of diversity in our good country.
These charlatans who have divided us with the propriety of their lofty exalted status that was accorded, acquired or embezzled through trickery and manipulation, must never be allowed to used their purported knowledge or wealth to hold us hostage. They must be vilified, shamed and accorded the dubious distinction and recognition as the gravest danger and threat to the common good in our country.
If one observes countries which are generally peaceful, it is those who have separated, as a prerequisite for peace, religion and state. In Malaysia we are having authorities assiduously observing what is deemed as the proper rituals in the defence of the faith and yet we have the poor, oppressed and marginalised and those of different beliefs being cast aside and seen as expandable in sum total of the countries advancement and progress.
The message of the Quran and Muslim faith seemed to have been hijacked and used in the most inappropriate and desiccative manner. This, I fear, will lead to a litany of evil deeds not just against non-Muslims but against Muslims who are considered moderates and liberals.
No individual should be excused or granted immunity for any excess in the representation their religious or political leaderships. Other countries have impeached their heads of governments or prominent figures inclusive of the judiciary for their excess.
Education, intelligence, religious or social status does not guarantee that one is immune or incapable of the worst atrocities. The higher the intellectual level or qualifications the greater the propensity for un-lamentable barbaric evil and mind boggling cruelty.
Radovan Karadzic, a Bosnian Serb, Pol Pot of Cambodia and Paul Kagame of Rwanda being personified case examples that are still locked in the time capsule of our collective memories.
Many individuals who are brought to trial for crimes against humanity are intelligent and evasive enough to articulate and claim immunity under the guise of government, military or orders of higher authority.
The standard claim is that one has no choice but to obey or being a minor participant one has to comply.
When one investigates the realm or rational or conscience the common denominator appears to be greed, advancement, belief and personal advantage. The fact that one can concoct all kinds of excuses in defence of evil is the clearest sign that freedom of choice is available.
Sometimes we attach a label for evil such as thoughtlessness or ignorance. The fact is that thoughtless or ignorant people are in excess a greater threat to society. If one strips from evil the defensive layers and coating of language that justifies its existence, naked to bone or skin, one will see the obvious intelligence and motive it possess.
We all make choices of acceptance on how we think and what we think, and the simple truth is that no one points a gun at our heads and forces such choices.
Will we mourn when the last of the diverse religions, faiths, atheist, ethnicities, indigenous tribes, individual philosophies and preferences are extinguished and exist no more?
Or will we gloat, laugh and dance over the bones of the dead on the account that one creed one culture and one philosophy lives in triumph over the diversity and exclusion of the others?
Even after having defiled the conventions of good and tasting the blood and meat of all the corpses of the various ethnicities and religious, the wicked evil is the inordinate hidden joker in the stacked cards of life. The human insecurities on the triumph of extermination may linger around to haunt those who remain.
We may kill one another on the simple premise that one’s eyes are not same as another, or some deformity in physique or character is prevalent and the cycle of extermination has renewed purpose and is reborn in a new season. How does one stop the vicious cycle?
The simple truth is that religious or human morality is safeguard that prevent our human frailty from going off tangent. We must recognise that combating evil in any form requires consistent vigilance as evil is here to stay.
With guile, deception, cunning and stealth it may metamorphise and manifest itself in any shape, form thought, creed, culture or philosophy.

Will we find our courage before our personal Auschwitz of evil threatens to envelope, imprison, condemn and cage us before the winter of life is upon us? Or will we sacrifice the convenience of life and fight for common decency, virtues and values that we call peace, freedom and equality? – December 23, 2014.
- See more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/sideviews/article/mask-of-evil-dominic-damian#sthash.lgdutaIU.dpuf

What robbed us of our innocence? Part 1

What robbed us of our innocence?

April 28, 2014
FMT LETTER: From Dr Dominic Damian, via e-mail
What is it that broke the yoke of this magical formula and robbed us of our innocence? Can we feel the pulse of what really broke the backbone of the family unit in the country? There are varied reasons and I may not be correct about the whole scenario, but this is how I see it.
Materialistic greed was not yet realised in the era of the 60s. The concern in fighting the insurgency and winning the hearts and minds of the general population was a binding force. It was the pragmatic realisation that the bread of equality offered was the only plausible and acceptable way to win a battle.
There was never an issue of a majority race with inalienable rights. Each and every individual was an important component in building the infrastructure of a fledgling nation. There were various major races and persons of ethnic background who were involved in the army, police and civil service. The legal system was that of the highest order.
Power was never realised as concept to rule but rather to serve. Our early leaders were not persons who were of exceptional intelligence or creative talents. They were just individuals who carried the hopes of a nation on the shoulders of rational thought and supported by the moral principles of rights and wrongs. The rule of law was rarely abused. The taxpayer’s money was never squandered on dubious ventures nor were there politicians who just enriched themselves or their families.
Religion was a beautiful concept, we Catholics used to fast rigorously for the Lent period, quite a few of us cheated on the fast but it was never a dramatic issue, our Muslim brothers and sisters would also fast during the month of Ramadan and likewise the Hindus. No one questioned the other – it was accepted as a simple fact of each one’s life.
Our friends from the various religious backgrounds would come to the Church for some music and likewise one could go to the mosque or temple. There never were issues with serious or dramatic consequences. There are friends who gave me books on their respective faiths and this was read and it most certainly helped in building the walls of the soul.
One cannot claim that racial segregation was not evident, there were occasions especially that some segments of the Chinese community would show their prejudice towards others, by giving items at cheaper prices to members within their community, or telling other races that certain items were beyond their budget, or even keeping the best items for members of their own community.
The Indians likewise, had their own share of prejudices and stereotyping against the Chinese. Can we blame the individuals involved for such racism. I think that there wasn’t sufficient education or knowledge on racial equality and as such this can be attributed to ignorance more than malice. Nevertheless, one cannot run away from these weaknesses but just hang our heads in shame that we had this in our past. Acknowledgment and the resolve to improve will always make us better persons.
On the political front we had in our midst a brilliant and far-sighted visionary in Onn Jaffar, while America and Europe were still struggling with racism, we had a man with conscience and moral wisdom. This was a person who could see the country beyond the lenses of ethnicity, culture or creed. In Malaysia, the ‘ I have a dream’ speech was in reality being promoted by Onn Jaffar long before any leader, other than Ghandi, in the world was advocating such causes.
When his cause was rejected by those who were his closest aides it had already consigned us to the eventualities of a future that would compromise us as a nation in the wrong hands. The architects and engineers of Onn Jaffar’s fall were around to show themselves in the future. It must be made known that Onn Jaffar could never have succeeded against the prevalent sentiment of his aides, to obtain a new mandate would have been so very difficult in terms of communication logistics as he would have had to create new branches over the length and breadth of the country in the shortest span of time.
Umno branches were already in place, having been built over a number of years. There was no way that Onn Jaffar’s positive thoughts could have reached the masses given the many disadvantages. It is such a pity that the mainstream parties and important political figures could not see and appreciate the vision of this great man. Onn Jaffar may have been one our very first of our unique original minorities, his compassion, rational forward thinking, conscientious voice was lost in the wilderness of self interest.
The undeserving, inglorious, ignominious end of Onn Jaffar was an implosion with tragic consequences within Umno where leaders are never secure. This is clearly evident in the way the Tunku, Hussein Onn and Abdullah Ahmad Badwai were all dispatched in an insidious manner. When a good ideology or leader or thought is forsaken and sacrificed – anything in the future can be compromised. The precedence for good is overtaken by the brooding forces of dark that only fight for themselves other than the citizens of the country.
Tunku would have experienced and must have felt the same way as Onn Jaffar had felt, that there was no place in the politics of this country for men or women of calibre who cared about the common dignity of the citizen. The advent of May 13, 1969 did not separate the country and it is now an indispensable knowledge available as the truth unravels that it never was a racial disturbance as we were led to believe.
It was a combination of elements the circumstance emanated from the politics, and various other factors that came together by intention, engineered incidents and some that were sheer accidents or ill-luck. This is borne by the simple fact that it was not widespread and contained within specific parts of the country. It also seems to be an excuse engineered by the political elite to keep and take power.
The baton or torch of leadership was passed from our beloved Tunku Abdul Rahman in a manner less than dignified. The wheels were already set in motion and the trajectory of ills that would degrade and depreciate a nation was already in place. Even those who assumed powers would never have foreseen the destruction and havoc that a single incident can impact a nation. All other negatives that followed were just the follow up consequence of what may be the single biggest mistake.
Removing a leader, especially a founder and one accorded the title of ‘Father’ opened the Pandora’s box of how easy it was to obtain power. If one can do it to the Father of a Nation, one can do it to anyone – nobody is safe. Everyone can be removed and everyone has a price. The security of an unassailable position could be broken and breached with relative ease.
Now we ought to reflect what was it that made the Tunku a very special individual. He did not posses exceptional gifts or extraordinary leadership capabilities, he was respected for his common touch, empathy, honesty and the skeletons of corruption can never be found in the closet of his life or any of his living relatives. Neither was he a manufactured leader who needed public relation officials to prop him on a charm offensive.
His weakness and strengths was an open book and he endeared himself to the common citizen. If one were to compare him to our all leaders who followed after him it would be an equivalent of holding a lighted candle against the brilliance of the sun. His faults that cost him the leadership were simplicity, honesty and a naïve trusting disposition.
The leaders that followed after Tunku stepped down may have been more capable, astute or intelligent and would have thought they would receive support and loyalty of an equal standard. The magical ingredients of nobility, dignity, concern, care, humility and simplicity could never be replicated and could never be bought. Tunku’s wealth was his good natured character in excess.
Many who toiled to make the country successful were inspired by the Tunku. My father used to refer to him in Malayam as ‘achan’ – translated as brother. This is the affinity and esteem that Tunku established in the relationship of trust with the citizen. With Tunku’s removal, no PM who followed could retain the full trust of his cabinet, party members or members of other component parties.
How does one trust the acquisition of a leadership when it may be tainted with an act of dishonour? There was an article of Tunku in the Readers Digest where it was expressed that he was the happiest PM in the world, and we may have been the happiest citizens in the world. In this current day and age a political scientist expounds the latest theory of a good government being adjudged by the happiness index of the citizen. We already had this concept in our leadership and especially in our first prime minister. No genius, political scientist or analyst was required to give us a complex jargon of happiness – we lived it through live experiences.